CVE-2026-97994
Last modified
CVE-2026-97994 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vhost/vdpa: reject VRING_NUM larger than device max vhost_vring_set_num() accepts any non-zero power-of-two queue size that fits in 16 bits. vhost-vdpa then passes that value to set_vq_num() without comparing it with get_vq_num_max(). A process with access to /dev/vhost-vdpa-* can therefore configure a queue larger than the device advertises.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vhost/vdpa: reject VRING_NUM larger than device max vhost_vring_set_num() accepts any non-zero power-of-two queue size that fits in 16 bits. vhost-vdpa then passes that value to set_vq_num() without comparing it with get_vq_num_max(). A process with access to /dev/vhost-vdpa-* can therefore configure a queue larger than the device advertises. With vdpa_sim, the worker can walk descriptors beyond the mapped descriptor ring. KASAN reports a 16-byte out-of-bounds read, corresponding to one vring_desc, in the vringh IOTLB path: BUG: KASAN: out-of-bounds in _copy_from_iter Read of size 16 copy_from_iotlb copydesc_iotlb vringh_getdesc_iotlb vdpasim_net_work Cache get_vq_num_max() immediately after reset. Some backends derive it from writable queue-size state, so querying it after SET_NUM may return the current size instead of the device capability. Invalidate the cached value before reset so a failed reset leaves SET_NUM disabled. For VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM, copy the complete vring state once and use the same index and size for validation, vq->num, and set_vq_num(). This ensures that validation and use operate on the same copied values.
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 4c8cf31885f69e86be0b5b9e6677a26797365e1d, < 1d09201d81b7d3e276860cc7b7dbf6c6cbe8e9b4; >= 4c8cf31885f69e86be0b5b9e6677a26797365e1d, < 68232102f20fc961327fb9e0f605a7eaadf030a9; >= 4c8cf31885f69e86be0b5b9e6677a26797365e1d, < 59522639a7d71cff4e20d594d0b9ea30dd0c77e0; >= 4c8cf31885f69e86be0b5b9e6677a26797365e1d, < ccb1dc7c527f8c925925cf92afc76ae590dac311 |
| Linux | Linux | 5.7 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-97994?
How severe is CVE-2026-97994?
How do I fix CVE-2026-97994?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-97989In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9799A flaw was found in org.keycloak.authorization. An authentic…4.6
- CVE-2026-97990In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.5
- CVE-2026-97991In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-97992In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-97993In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-97995In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-97996In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-97997In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-97998In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9800A flaw was found in Keycloak Policy Enforcer. This vulnerabi…8.1
- CVE-2026-98000In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-97994?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
