CVE-2026-98094
Last modified
CVE-2026-98094 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 5.5/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts enabled. Lockdep reports a possible IRQ lock inversion involving dirty_lock and console_owner. EPSS estimates a 0.18% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts enabled. Lockdep reports a possible IRQ lock inversion involving dirty_lock and console_owner. A hardirq can interrupt a CPU holding dirty_lock and enter the console rendering path, which can attempt to acquire dirty_lock again. The following lockdep report was observed on an RK3566 system with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled: WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected swapper/2/0 just changed the state of lock: (console_owner){-...}-{0:0} but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past: (&par->dirty_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&par->dirty_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(console_owner); lock(&par->dirty_lock); <Interrupt> lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** Use spin_lock_irqsave() for fbtft_mkdirty() and spin_lock_irq() for fbtft_deferred_io(). They only access the dirty line range, so the IRQ-off regions remain short.
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 4.0, < 5.10.271 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.11, < 5.15.222 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 5.16, < 6.1.189 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.2, < 6.6.158 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.7, < 6.12.111 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.13, < 6.18.53 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 6.19, < 7.2.7 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 7.3 | Rc1 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Analyzed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-98094?
How severe is CVE-2026-98094?
How do I fix CVE-2026-98094?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-98089In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9809A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in …7.6
- CVE-2026-98090In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98091In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98092In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98093In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-98095In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98096In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.4
- CVE-2026-98097In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.3
- CVE-2026-98098In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98099In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…4.7
- CVE-2026-9810The AI Copilot WordPress plugin before 1.5.4 does not bind …9.8
Are you affected by CVE-2026-98094?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
