CVE-2026-98135
Last modified
CVE-2026-98135 is a medium-severity vulnerability rated 5.5/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs: reject invalid sectors_per_cluster in the boot sector is_boot_sector_ntfs() checks the boot sector's sectors_per_cluster field with a range test that rejects 0x81..0xf3 but accepts 0 and other non-power-of-two counts. A zero value reaches parse_ntfs_boot_sector(): sectors_per_cluster_bits = ffs(sectors_per_cluster) - 1; ... vol->cluster_size = vol->sector_size << sectors_per_cluster_bits; ffs(0) is 0, so sectors_per_cluster_bits becomes (unsigned)-1 and the shift is undefined: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/ntfs/super.c:673:39 shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' This change rejects any non-power-of-two value, since it feeds the aforementioned shift via ffs() - 1, which only yields the correct shift for a power of two.. EPSS estimates a 0.10% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs: reject invalid sectors_per_cluster in the boot sector is_boot_sector_ntfs() checks the boot sector's sectors_per_cluster field with a range test that rejects 0x81..0xf3 but accepts 0 and other non-power-of-two counts. A zero value reaches parse_ntfs_boot_sector(): sectors_per_cluster_bits = ffs(sectors_per_cluster) - 1; ... vol->cluster_size = vol->sector_size << sectors_per_cluster_bits; ffs(0) is 0, so sectors_per_cluster_bits becomes (unsigned)-1 and the shift is undefined: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/ntfs/super.c:673:39 shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' This change rejects any non-power-of-two value, since it feeds the aforementioned shift via ffs() - 1, which only yields the correct shift for a power of two.
Metrics
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | >= 7.1, < 7.2.7 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 7.3 | Rc1 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Analyzed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-98135?
How severe is CVE-2026-98135?
How do I fix CVE-2026-98135?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-9813FlowIntel up to version 3.3.0 contains a server-side request…9.9
- CVE-2026-98130In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.1
- CVE-2026-98131In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98132In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98133In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98134In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98136In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.1
- CVE-2026-98137In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98138In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-98139In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2026-9814An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the boa form…9.1
- CVE-2026-98140In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
Are you affected by CVE-2026-98135?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
