CVE-2026-98432
Last modified
CVE-2026-98432 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock() transfers ownership of ireq->ireq_opt to the child socket (newinet->inet_opt) without copying it. Another cpu can concurrently process a retransmitted SYN for the same request socket, and send a SYNACK from tcp_check_req(). tcp_v4_send_synack() and inet_csk_route_req() read ireq->ireq_opt under rcu_read_lock() only, and ip_build_and_send_pkt() and ip_options_build() then read opt->optlen twice. Note that the SYNACK timer itself is not an issue: it holds a reference on its request socket, and inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop() calls timer_delete_sync() before the child can be freed. Since commit 079096f103fa ("tcp/dccp: install syn_recv requests into ehash table"), request sockets are processed without holding the listener lock, so nothing prevents the child socket from being freed while the SYNACK is still being built. TCP child sockets do not have SOCK_RCU_FREE, and inet_sock_destruct() frees inet_opt with a plain kfree(), leading to a use-after-free in ip_options_build(). A similar issue exists with request socket migration (net.ipv4.tcp_migrate_req=1, or a BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT_OR_MIGRATE program).
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock() transfers ownership of ireq->ireq_opt to the child socket (newinet->inet_opt) without copying it. Another cpu can concurrently process a retransmitted SYN for the same request socket, and send a SYNACK from tcp_check_req(). tcp_v4_send_synack() and inet_csk_route_req() read ireq->ireq_opt under rcu_read_lock() only, and ip_build_and_send_pkt() and ip_options_build() then read opt->optlen twice. Note that the SYNACK timer itself is not an issue: it holds a reference on its request socket, and inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop() calls timer_delete_sync() before the child can be freed. Since commit 079096f103fa ("tcp/dccp: install syn_recv requests into ehash table"), request sockets are processed without holding the listener lock, so nothing prevents the child socket from being freed while the SYNACK is still being built. TCP child sockets do not have SOCK_RCU_FREE, and inet_sock_destruct() frees inet_opt with a plain kfree(), leading to a use-after-free in ip_options_build(). A similar issue exists with request socket migration (net.ipv4.tcp_migrate_req=1, or a BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT_OR_MIGRATE program). reqsk_timer_handler() clones the request socket with inet_reqsk_clone(), so that the old request socket and its clone share the same ireq_opt, then reqsk_migrate_reset() clears the pointer in the old one. Another cpu holding a reference on the old request socket can still be using these options (sending a SYNACK, or creating a child in tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock()) when the clone is freed, and tcp_v4_reqsk_destructor() also uses a plain kfree(). Readers already use RCU, and other paths replacing inet_opt (do_ip_setsockopt(), cipso_v4_sock_setattr()...) already use kfree_rcu(). Use kfree_rcu() in inet_sock_destruct() and tcp_v4_reqsk_destructor() as well. IPv6 is not affected by the first issue, because tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock() duplicates the options. tcp_v6_reqsk_destructor() has the same migration issue with ipv6_opt, which is only set by CALIPSO. This will be addressed in a separate patch.
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 079096f103faca2dd87342cca6f23d4b34da8871, < b3b027ef0cd322bfa839b9aaf5b27551eea54cf6; >= 079096f103faca2dd87342cca6f23d4b34da8871, < 95a8c8fa9f27dce64c40c41c062de7728bf34ab5; >= 079096f103faca2dd87342cca6f23d4b34da8871, < 89b5b1eb7d633c33832b7ff2c02e19a144705036; >= 079096f103faca2dd87342cca6f23d4b34da8871, < 742f73df544e03744f2981c467d6542fe8172a2a; >= 079096f103faca2dd87342cca6f23d4b34da8871, < 11a03ce3c4a62d84c10ccdfe47f8075006498568; >= 079096f103faca2dd87342cca6f23d4b34da8871, < a47406c769f72c070386985488f1c4d057df86b2; >= 079096f103faca2dd87342cca6f23d4b34da8871, < 26d4c36d318cffbbd160884a0e4cec0da4da4936; >= 079096f103faca2dd87342cca6f23d4b34da8871, < e3f33b0a1d89d738e2b913dab519226eaf76e15b |
| Linux | Linux | 4.4 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-98432?
How severe is CVE-2026-98432?
How do I fix CVE-2026-98432?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-98427In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98428In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98429In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9843The Database for Contact Form 7, WPforms, Elementor forms pl…8.1
- CVE-2026-98430In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98431In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9844Use of default credentials vulnerability in Roche Diagnostic…8.8
- CVE-2026-9848The WP Ticket plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Inje…7.5
- CVE-2026-9851The Booking Package plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Pr…7.2
- CVE-2026-9852A CSV injection vulnerability exists in SYS600. Injected mal…7.8
- CVE-2026-9853A vulnerability exists in SYS600 which allows any user authe…7.8
- CVE-2026-9854A vulnerability exists in SYS600 RBAC mechanism where users …7.8
Are you affected by CVE-2026-98432?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
