CVE-2026-98643
Last modified
CVE-2026-98643 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read of rtt_min in sock_ops A sockops prog reading skops->rtt_min never checks the sk type: on the tcp_conn_request() path sock_ops->sk is a request_sock (non-full), and the ctx rewrite casts it to a tcp_sock (full) and reads rtt_min past the end of the request_sock, returning dirty adjacent memory. SEC("sockops") int prog(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops) { switch (skops->op) { case BPF_SOCK_OPS_RWND_INIT: leak = skops->rtt_min; /* reads the request_sock OOB */ ... } } For instance one such read returned rtt_min=0xffff8881, the high half of a leaked kernel pointer. Guarding that cast is exactly what SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD() does -- it checks is_locked_tcp_sock and returns 0 when sock_ops->sk is not a locked full socket. Every other tcp_sock field in sock_ops goes through it; rtt_min is the only one open-coded, so it skips the check. Read rtt_min through SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD() too.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read of rtt_min in sock_ops A sockops prog reading skops->rtt_min never checks the sk type: on the tcp_conn_request() path sock_ops->sk is a request_sock (non-full), and the ctx rewrite casts it to a tcp_sock (full) and reads rtt_min past the end of the request_sock, returning dirty adjacent memory. SEC("sockops") int prog(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops) { switch (skops->op) { case BPF_SOCK_OPS_RWND_INIT: leak = skops->rtt_min; /* reads the request_sock OOB */ ... } } For instance one such read returned rtt_min=0xffff8881, the high half of a leaked kernel pointer. Guarding that cast is exactly what SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD() does -- it checks is_locked_tcp_sock and returns 0 when sock_ops->sk is not a locked full socket. Every other tcp_sock field in sock_ops goes through it; rtt_min is the only one open-coded, so it skips the check. Read rtt_min through SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD() too. rtt_min is a bit special: it is a struct minmax and we only want the current min, so pass rtt_min.s[0].v. That is equivalent to the old hand-computed offset offsetof(struct tcp_sock, rtt_min) + sizeof_field(struct minmax_sample, t) (s[0] sits at rtt_min + 0 and .v at + sizeof(.t), i.e. what minmax_get() returns), so the loaded field is unchanged and only the full-sock guard is added. The two BUILD_BUG_ON()s that protected the hand-computed offset are no longer needed. Before patch: 0: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) ; r1 = skops->sk 1: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +2324) ; ((tcp_sock *)sk)->rtt_min.s[0].v After patch: 0: *(u64 *)(r1 +56) = r9 1: r9 = *(u8 *)(r1 +50) ; is_locked_tcp_sock 2: if r9 == 0 goto pc+4 ; not a locked full sock -> 0 3: r9 = *(u64 *)(r1 +56) 4: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) ; r1 = skops->sk 5: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +2324) ; rtt_min.s[0].v 6: goto pc+2 7: r9 = *(u64 *)(r1 +56) 8: r1 = 0
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 44f0e43037d3a17b043843ba67610ac7c7e37db6, < 0c796efa919f52f788c22c79d1f1b70321696b3d; >= 44f0e43037d3a17b043843ba67610ac7c7e37db6, < fc9d0e6e9d86fbefe7b8fe6ee49f4cf102add79d; >= 44f0e43037d3a17b043843ba67610ac7c7e37db6, < fd6bf2721933d8c90bc4ce57f3e204c9295e7e3f; >= 44f0e43037d3a17b043843ba67610ac7c7e37db6, < a8a9becbac93a9f54f4d565f1f3005eb08a7912f; >= 44f0e43037d3a17b043843ba67610ac7c7e37db6, < 3a46f14e6cf375f3ca38f8f6e6524749e24ea0a8; >= 44f0e43037d3a17b043843ba67610ac7c7e37db6, < 6785313d4fac96afb21ef193610c1fa88b1a9e64; >= 44f0e43037d3a17b043843ba67610ac7c7e37db6, < cba54d142c43ec96d8c4d566f66439e8c0afded7; >= 44f0e43037d3a17b043843ba67610ac7c7e37db6, < 75f8cf22463d82bb1fb0239a3d485fc8f4c8ef03 |
| Linux | Linux | 4.16 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-98643?
How severe is CVE-2026-98643?
How do I fix CVE-2026-98643?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-98638In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98639In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9864Fortra BoKS Server Agent contains a predictable password gen…4.8
- CVE-2026-98640In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98641In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98642In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98644In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98645In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98646In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98647In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98648In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98649In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-98643?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
