CVE-2026-99134
Last modified
CVE-2026-99134 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mac802154: fix data race and NULL deref on local->assoc_dev local->assoc_dev is shared between the association path and the association-response worker without common synchronization. mac802154_perform_association() stores the coordinator pointer and waits for a response. Its timeout and error paths clear the pointer and return to mac802154_associate(), which may then free the coordinator object. Meanwhile, mac802154_rx_mac_cmd_worker() may observe the associating bit and enter mac802154_process_association_resp(), which dereferences assoc_dev. The worker's bit test and the handler's pointer dereference are not atomic with respect to cleanup. EPSS estimates a 0.17% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mac802154: fix data race and NULL deref on local->assoc_dev local->assoc_dev is shared between the association path and the association-response worker without common synchronization. mac802154_perform_association() stores the coordinator pointer and waits for a response. Its timeout and error paths clear the pointer and return to mac802154_associate(), which may then free the coordinator object. Meanwhile, mac802154_rx_mac_cmd_worker() may observe the associating bit and enter mac802154_process_association_resp(), which dereferences assoc_dev. The worker's bit test and the handler's pointer dereference are not atomic with respect to cleanup. Cleanup can clear assoc_dev between them, causing a NULL dereference, or free the coordinator while the response handler still uses the pointer. The recorded result is exposed to the same window. assoc_status and assoc_addr are written by the handler but read by the association path while the associating bit is still set, so a second response for the same request - a malicious one, for instance - can replace them between those reads and leave the caller with an incoherent status and address pair. The response handler only needs the coordinator extended address. Replace assoc_dev with a cached address, removing the pointer lifetime dependency. Protect the cached address and the associating bit with a dedicated spinlock. A READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() pair would not guarantee an atomic __le64 access on all 32-bit architectures. wpan_dev->association_lock cannot be reused here: nl802154_associate() holds it across rdev_associate(), hence for the whole of mac802154_perform_association() including the wait for the response. A response handler taking that lock would only get it once the association has already given up. Reset the completion, publish the cached address, and set the associating bit while holding the lock. The response handler takes the lock, rechecks the bit and the cached address, records the response, clears the bit, and only then completes the waiter. Thus cleanup cannot pass the handler between its state check and completion, and the cached 64-bit value cannot tear. The handler clears the bit before completing, not the woken waiter: otherwise complete() is issued under the lock and a second (e.g. malicious) response can reacquire it before the waiter and replace the result. So a wait that returns success implies the bit is already clear, and the success and negative-response paths return directly. The transmit-error and timeout paths still clear it under assoc_lock, which serializes any racing response against the cleanup while the call returns the error it already selected. Both paths snapshot assoc_status and assoc_addr under the same lock. Both users run in process context, so a plain spinlock is sufficient. The lock is not held while waiting for the completion.
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= fefd19807fe9c65002366c749e809996a1ca4e68, < cfbb59fb0bc8ec82d98189a4df66ccc03d159386; >= fefd19807fe9c65002366c749e809996a1ca4e68, < 3cdd8b1abddebbae2582e90294c77b61d5f5aee7; >= fefd19807fe9c65002366c749e809996a1ca4e68, < a585901bb8cd2cd60d678be8a56ca6a4e1a6946c; >= fefd19807fe9c65002366c749e809996a1ca4e68, < c037915f80c4db47f7d061d68e703ffd551b1a34 |
| Linux | Linux | 6.8 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-99134?
How severe is CVE-2026-99134?
How do I fix CVE-2026-99134?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-99129In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9913Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior…4.3
- CVE-2026-99130In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-99131In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.2
- CVE-2026-99132In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-99133In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-99135In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-99136In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7
- CVE-2026-99137In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-99138In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-99139In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9914Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE in Googl…8.3
Are you affected by CVE-2026-99134?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
