CVE-2017-1000410
Last modified
CVE-2017-1000410 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. The Linux kernel version 3.3-rc1 and later is affected by a vulnerability lies in the processing of incoming L2CAP commands - ConfigRequest, and ConfigResponse messages. This info leak is a result of uninitialized stack variables that may be returned to an attacker in their uninitialized state. EPSS estimates a 4.25% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
The Linux kernel version 3.3-rc1 and later is affected by a vulnerability lies in the processing of incoming L2CAP commands - ConfigRequest, and ConfigResponse messages. This info leak is a result of uninitialized stack variables that may be returned to an attacker in their uninitialized state. By manipulating the code flows that precede the handling of these configuration messages, an attacker can also gain some control over which data will be held in the uninitialized stack variables. This can allow him to bypass KASLR, and stack canaries protection - as both pointers and stack canaries may be leaked in this manner. Combining this vulnerability (for example) with the previously disclosed RCE vulnerability in L2CAP configuration parsing (CVE-2017-1000251) may allow an attacker to exploit the RCE against kernels which were built with the above mitigations. These are the specifics of this vulnerability: In the function l2cap_parse_conf_rsp and in the function l2cap_parse_conf_req the following variable is declared without initialization: struct l2cap_conf_efs efs; In addition, when parsing input configuration parameters in both of these functions, the switch case for handling EFS elements may skip the memcpy call that will write to the efs variable: ... case L2CAP_CONF_EFS: if (olen == sizeof(efs)) memcpy(&efs, (void *)val, olen); ... The olen in the above if is attacker controlled, and regardless of that if, in both of these functions the efs variable would eventually be added to the outgoing configuration request that is being built: l2cap_add_conf_opt(&ptr, L2CAP_CONF_EFS, sizeof(efs), (unsigned long) &efs); So by sending a configuration request, or response, that contains an L2CAP_CONF_EFS element, but with an element length that is not sizeof(efs) - the memcpy to the uninitialized efs variable can be avoided, and the uninitialized variable would be returned to the attacker (16 bytes).
Metrics
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux Kernel | > 3.2, < 4.15 | — |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 4.15 | Rc1 |
| Debian | Debian Linux | 8.0 | — |
| Debian | Debian Linux | 9.0 | — |
| Redhat | Virtualization Host | 4.0 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Desktop | 6.0 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Desktop | 7.0 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Server | 6.0 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Server | 7.0 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Server Aus | 7.6 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Server Eus | 7.4 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Server Eus | 7.6 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Server Tus | 7.4 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Server Tus | 7.6 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Workstation | 6.0 | — |
| Redhat | Enterprise Linux Workstation | 7.0 | — |
References
- http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q4/357Issue Tracking, Mailing List, Patch, Third Party Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102101Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0654Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0676Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1062Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1130Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1170Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1319Third Party Advisory
- https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4073Third Party Advisory
- https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4082Third Party Advisory
- http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q4/357Issue Tracking, Mailing List, Patch, Third Party Advisory
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102101Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0654Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0676Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1062Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1130Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1170Third Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1319Third Party Advisory
- https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4073Third Party Advisory
- https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4082Third Party Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Modified
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2017-1000410?
How severe is CVE-2017-1000410?
How do I fix CVE-2017-1000410?
Are you affected by CVE-2017-1000410?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
