CVE-2025-39985
Last modified
CVE-2025-39985 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.8/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: mcba_usb: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that skb->len fits the interface's MTU. Unfortunately, because the mcba_usb driver does not populate its net_device_ops->ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example: $ ip link set can0 mtu 9999 After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the ETH_P_CANXL protocol: socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL)) to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. EPSS estimates a 0.22% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: mcba_usb: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that skb->len fits the interface's MTU. Unfortunately, because the mcba_usb driver does not populate its net_device_ops->ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example: $ ip link set can0 mtu 9999 After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the ETH_P_CANXL protocol: socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL)) to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. For example: struct canxl_frame frame = { .flags = 0xff, .len = 2048, }; The CAN drivers' xmit() function are calling can_dev_dropped_skb() to check that the skb is valid, unfortunately under above conditions, the malicious packet is able to go through can_dev_dropped_skb() checks: 1. the skb->protocol is set to ETH_P_CANXL which is valid (the function does not check the actual device capabilities). 2. the length is a valid CAN XL length. And so, mcba_usb_start_xmit() receives a CAN XL frame which it is not able to correctly handle and will thus misinterpret it as a CAN frame. This can result in a buffer overflow. The driver will consume cf->len as-is with no further checks on these lines: usb_msg.dlc = cf->len; memcpy(usb_msg.data, cf->data, usb_msg.dlc); Here, cf->len corresponds to the flags field of the CAN XL frame. In our previous example, we set canxl_frame->flags to 0xff. Because the maximum expected length is 8, a buffer overflow of 247 bytes occurs! Populate net_device_ops->ndo_change_mtu() to ensure that the interface's MTU can not be set to anything bigger than CAN_MTU. By fixing the root cause, this prevents the buffer overflow.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 51f3baad7de943780ce0c17bd7975df567dd6e14, < 0fa9303c4b9493727e0d3a6ac3729300e3013930; >= 51f3baad7de943780ce0c17bd7975df567dd6e14, < 37aed407496bf6de8910e588edb04d2435fa7011; >= 51f3baad7de943780ce0c17bd7975df567dd6e14, < 6eec67bfb25637f9b51e584cf59ddace59925bc8; >= 51f3baad7de943780ce0c17bd7975df567dd6e14, < ca4e51359608e1f29bf1f2c33c3ddf775b6b7ed1; >= 51f3baad7de943780ce0c17bd7975df567dd6e14, < 3664ae91b26d1fd7e4cee9cde17301361f4c89d5; >= 51f3baad7de943780ce0c17bd7975df567dd6e14, < 6b9fb82df8868dbe9ffea5874b8d35f951faedbb; >= 51f3baad7de943780ce0c17bd7975df567dd6e14, < b638c3fb0f163e69785ceddb3b434a9437878bec; >= 51f3baad7de943780ce0c17bd7975df567dd6e14, < 17c8d794527f01def0d1c8b7dc2d7b8d34fed0e6 |
| Linux | Linux | 4.12 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Deferred
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2025-39985?
How severe is CVE-2025-39985?
How do I fix CVE-2025-39985?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2025
- CVE-2025-3998A vulnerability classified as critical was found in CodeAstr…9.8
- CVE-2025-39980In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-39981In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-39982In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2025-39983In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2025-39984In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-39986In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-39987In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-39988In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-39989In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-3999A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has be…5.4
- CVE-2025-39990In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
Are you affected by CVE-2025-39985?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
