CVE-2025-39988
Last modified
CVE-2025-39988 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.8/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: etas_es58x: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that skb->len fits the interface's MTU. Unfortunately, because the etas_es58x driver does not populate its net_device_ops->ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example: $ ip link set can0 mtu 9999 After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the ETH_P_CANXL protocol: socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL)); to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. EPSS estimates a 0.22% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: etas_es58x: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that skb->len fits the interface's MTU. Unfortunately, because the etas_es58x driver does not populate its net_device_ops->ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example: $ ip link set can0 mtu 9999 After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the ETH_P_CANXL protocol: socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL)); to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. For example: struct canxl_frame frame = { .flags = 0xff, .len = 2048, }; The CAN drivers' xmit() function are calling can_dev_dropped_skb() to check that the skb is valid, unfortunately under above conditions, the malicious packet is able to go through can_dev_dropped_skb() checks: 1. the skb->protocol is set to ETH_P_CANXL which is valid (the function does not check the actual device capabilities). 2. the length is a valid CAN XL length. And so, es58x_start_xmit() receives a CAN XL frame which it is not able to correctly handle and will thus misinterpret it as a CAN(FD) frame. This can result in a buffer overflow. For example, using the es581.4 variant, the frame will be dispatched to es581_4_tx_can_msg(), go through the last check at the beginning of this function: if (can_is_canfd_skb(skb)) return -EMSGSIZE; and reach this line: memcpy(tx_can_msg->data, cf->data, cf->len); Here, cf->len corresponds to the flags field of the CAN XL frame. In our previous example, we set canxl_frame->flags to 0xff. Because the maximum expected length is 8, a buffer overflow of 247 bytes occurs! Populate net_device_ops->ndo_change_mtu() to ensure that the interface's MTU can not be set to anything bigger than CAN_MTU or CANFD_MTU (depending on the device capabilities). By fixing the root cause, this prevents the buffer overflow.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 8537257874e949a59c834cecfd5a063e11b64b0b, < 72de0facc50afdb101fb7197d880407f1abfc77f; >= 8537257874e949a59c834cecfd5a063e11b64b0b, < c4e582e686c4d683c87f2b4a316385b3d81d370f; >= 8537257874e949a59c834cecfd5a063e11b64b0b, < cbc1de71766f326a44bb798aeae4a7ef4a081cc9; >= 8537257874e949a59c834cecfd5a063e11b64b0b, < b26cccd87dcddc47b450a40f3b1ac3fe346efcff; >= 8537257874e949a59c834cecfd5a063e11b64b0b, < e587af2c89ecc6382c518febea52fa9ba81e47c0; >= 8537257874e949a59c834cecfd5a063e11b64b0b, < 38c0abad45b190a30d8284a37264d2127a6ec303 |
| Linux | Linux | 5.13 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Deferred
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2025-39988?
How severe is CVE-2025-39988?
How do I fix CVE-2025-39988?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2025
- CVE-2025-39982In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2025-39983In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2025-39984In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-39985In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-39986In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-39987In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-39989In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…5.5
- CVE-2025-3999A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has be…5.4
- CVE-2025-39990In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2025-39991In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-39992In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2025-39993In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
Are you affected by CVE-2025-39988?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
