CVE-2026-0861
Last modified
CVE-2026-0861 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 8.4/10 on the CVSS scale. Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions (memalign, posix_memalign, aligned_alloc) in the GNU C Library version 2.30 to 2.42 may result in an integer overflow, which could consequently result in a heap corruption. Note that the attacker must have control over both, the size as well as the alignment arguments of the memalign function to be able to exploit this. The size parameter must be close enough to PTRDIFF_MAX so as to overflow size_t along with the large alignment argument. EPSS estimates a 0.35% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions (memalign, posix_memalign, aligned_alloc) in the GNU C Library version 2.30 to 2.42 may result in an integer overflow, which could consequently result in a heap corruption. Note that the attacker must have control over both, the size as well as the alignment arguments of the memalign function to be able to exploit this. The size parameter must be close enough to PTRDIFF_MAX so as to overflow size_t along with the large alignment argument. This limits the malicious inputs for the alignment for memalign to the range [1<<62+ 1, 1<<63] and exactly 1<<63 for posix_memalign and aligned_alloc. Typically the alignment argument passed to such functions is a known constrained quantity (e.g. page size, block size, struct sizes) and is not attacker controlled, because of which this may not be easily exploitable in practice. An application bug could potentially result in the input alignment being too large, e.g. due to a different buffer overflow or integer overflow in the application or its dependent libraries, but that is again an uncommon usage pattern given typical sources of alignments.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness Enumeration
Affected Software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Gnu | Glibc | >= 2.30, <= 2.42 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Analyzed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-0861?
How severe is CVE-2026-0861?
How do I fix CVE-2026-0861?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-0854Certain DVR/NVR models developed by Merit LILIN has a OS Com…8.8
- CVE-2026-0855Certain IP Camera models developed by Merit LILIN has a OS C…8.8
- CVE-2026-0856Improper Access Control vulnerability in Mesalvo Meona Clien…7.8
- CVE-2026-0857Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information in Memory vulnera…6
- CVE-2026-0858Versions of the package net.sourceforge.plantuml:plantuml be…6.1
- CVE-2026-0859TYPO3's mail‑file spool deserialization flaw lets local user…7.8
- CVE-2026-0862The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is v…6.1
- CVE-2026-0863Using string formatting and exception handling, an attacker …9.9
- CVE-2026-0864When using the "configparser" module to write configuration …4.1
- CVE-2026-0865User-controlled header names and values containing newlines …5.9
- CVE-2026-0866Rejected reason: After the publication of the PoC by the res…
- CVE-2026-0867The Essential Widgets plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to …6.4
Are you affected by CVE-2026-0861?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
