CVE-2026-80781
Last modified
CVE-2026-80781 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: core: fix OOB read of field->usage in hid_set_field() hid_set_field() hands field->usage + offset to hid_dump_input() before the guard that bounds offset: hid_dump_input(field->report->device, field->usage + offset, value); if (offset >= field->report_count) { hid_err(...); return -1; } Under CONFIG_DEBUG_FS hid_dump_input() dereferences that pointer, with buf = hid_resolv_usage(usage->hid, NULL). The usage[] array is allocated inline with the hid_field in hid_register_field() and holds field->maxusage entries, so an offset past it reads off the end of the kvzalloc()ed allocation and into a neighbouring object.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: core: fix OOB read of field->usage in hid_set_field() hid_set_field() hands field->usage + offset to hid_dump_input() before the guard that bounds offset: hid_dump_input(field->report->device, field->usage + offset, value); if (offset >= field->report_count) { hid_err(...); return -1; } Under CONFIG_DEBUG_FS hid_dump_input() dereferences that pointer, with buf = hid_resolv_usage(usage->hid, NULL). The usage[] array is allocated inline with the hid_field in hid_register_field() and holds field->maxusage entries, so an offset past it reads off the end of the kvzalloc()ed allocation and into a neighbouring object. Had the guard run first, offset < report_count <= maxusage would already have confined the pointer to the array. A caller supplies such an offset today. picolcd_fb_send_tile() validates only report->maxfield before issuing hid_set_field(report->field[0], 11 + i, ...) for i = 0..31, so its offsets are fixed at 11..42 and are never checked against the bound field. When the device registers that field with fewer usages, the framebuffer deferred-io work drives the read on every tile. KASAN reports a 4-byte slab-out-of-bounds read in hid_dump_input() below hid_set_field(), and the same boot logs "offset (1) exceeds report_count (1)" from the guard that runs only afterwards. Move the hid_dump_input() call below the guard. Because field->maxusage >= field->report_count, the guard then establishes that field->usage + offset lies inside the array before it is dereferenced, for every caller and without changing behaviour on the valid path. Discovered by XBOW, triaged by Baul Lee <baul.lee@xbow.com>
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, < 465544b3d6602cfbdc2305d5cbfb7f4954353b63; >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, < 4993e1ab85d7d3f4a40d81852170f9665483bbd8; >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, < 313ead1abed945544703b100a12c5a10fdf78409; >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, < c1d9c16af51cc6ff92a5a062617d3b022dd01078; >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, < a38212687519f2a72f43e62dec1348a690412404; >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, < 9a1d7c5f0d82e8665715d5e47c9410c6a97e3748; >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, < 5215ea00a747eca34cb2f603cfef91fef76c2558; >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, < cbcc0e8dea499e5ca86b583372ccb1815cccc570; >= 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, < a13cdb19fcb223ed41bdab3bab42b98dba87e90b |
| Linux | Linux | 2.6.12 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-80781?
How severe is CVE-2026-80781?
How do I fix CVE-2026-80781?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-80776In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80777In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80778In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80779In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-8078Stored cross-site scripting in the global settings change lo…4.8
- CVE-2026-80780In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80782In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80783In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80784In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80785In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80786In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-80787In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-80781?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
