CVE-2026-98070
Last modified
CVE-2026-98070 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 8.1/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() quiesces the transmit path by setting the path state to RDS_CONN_RESETTING and then waiting for RDS_IN_XMIT to be sampled clear before swapping the underlying socket and calling rds_send_path_reset(). Sampling the bit clear is not the same as owning it: rds_send_xmit() can re-acquire RDS_IN_XMIT right after the wait_event() returns. Its state recheck after taking the lock is a store-buffering pattern (the resetter writes the state and reads the bit, the sender writes the bit and reads the state) and acquire_in_xmit() is only an acquire operation, so on weakly ordered architectures both sides can miss each other's write and the transmit path then runs concurrently with rds_send_path_reset() rewriting cp_xmit_* state - which is exactly what the comment above rds_send_path_reset() tells its callers to prevent. Take the lock instead, hold it across the socket swap and rds_send_path_reset(), and release it with a wake-up at the end.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() quiesces the transmit path by setting the path state to RDS_CONN_RESETTING and then waiting for RDS_IN_XMIT to be sampled clear before swapping the underlying socket and calling rds_send_path_reset(). Sampling the bit clear is not the same as owning it: rds_send_xmit() can re-acquire RDS_IN_XMIT right after the wait_event() returns. Its state recheck after taking the lock is a store-buffering pattern (the resetter writes the state and reads the bit, the sender writes the bit and reads the state) and acquire_in_xmit() is only an acquire operation, so on weakly ordered architectures both sides can miss each other's write and the transmit path then runs concurrently with rds_send_path_reset() rewriting cp_xmit_* state - which is exactly what the comment above rds_send_path_reset() tells its callers to prevent. Take the lock instead, hold it across the socket swap and rds_send_path_reset(), and release it with a wake-up at the end. The lock-ordering constraint documented above the wait still holds: the lock is acquired before lock_sock(), so a sender inside tcp_sendmsg() can never be waited on while we hold the socket lock. Two details of the old code go away with the same change: - t_sock is now read only after the lock is acquired. The old code cached it before waiting; the teardown in rds_conn_shutdown() releases that socket and clears t_sock, so a pointer cached before the wait can be stale by the time the accept path resumes. Reading it under RDS_IN_XMIT is what makes the exclusion complete once the teardown owns the same lock, which the next patch arranges; until then the teardown still only samples the bit, and the two paths remain as exposed to each other as they are today. - The old !osock early path called rds_send_path_reset() with no serialization at all. It now runs under the lock like the normal path. The conditional RDS_CONN_RESETTING transition of the previous patch happens before the socket check either way: a path found without a socket is either still connecting (its reconnect worker blocked on t_conn_path_lock) and legitimately goes RESETTING -> UP on the new socket, or it has been torn down meanwhile and is dropped. The in-function comment describing the old wait-based quiesce is rewritten to describe the lock-based one, and the stale block comment above the function (which still described a return value and an incomplete list of t_sock writers) is refreshed to name all four writers - the connect, accept, teardown and swap paths - and what serializes each of them.
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 335b48d980f631fbc5b233cbb3625ac0c86d67cb, < d625112564c3e980e02504270222b49b82690cee; >= 335b48d980f631fbc5b233cbb3625ac0c86d67cb, < 8e4c3b7844c906c7097b4cfedd9dd1f48c9a6a92; >= 335b48d980f631fbc5b233cbb3625ac0c86d67cb, < 062d9e008c67289e8e1b221ecdd8f9d60566d012; >= 335b48d980f631fbc5b233cbb3625ac0c86d67cb, < 02c5f9dc2efd823e061954d564ce00bacd1bebeb |
| Linux | Linux | 4.7 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-98070?
How severe is CVE-2026-98070?
How do I fix CVE-2026-98070?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-98065In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98066In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98067In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98068In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98069In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.1
- CVE-2026-9807GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all…4.3
- CVE-2026-98071In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98072In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98073In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-98074In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98075In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98076In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-98070?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
