CVE-2026-98075

Unknown

Last modified

CVE-2026-98075 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: reject BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC reference to the main program fixups.c:jit_subprogs() rewrites BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC loads to contain real function addresses. This function is invoked from bpf_jit_subprogs() only when env->subprog_cnt > 1.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: reject BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC reference to the main program fixups.c:jit_subprogs() rewrites BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC loads to contain real function addresses. This function is invoked from bpf_jit_subprogs() only when env->subprog_cnt > 1. Meaning that for any program like below: int main(void *ctx) { void *ptr = main; ... bpf_timer_set_callback(..., ptr); ... } The 'ptr' won't be ever converted to contain an address. In combination with e.g. bpf_timer_set_callback() this would lead to a function call at a bogus address. Instead of complicating the implementation, just assume that no useful program needs main to be a sync or async callback and reject BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC loads for the main subprogram.

Affected Software

Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.

VendorProductVersions
LinuxLinux>= 69c087ba6225b574afb6e505b72cb75242a3d844, < 118212417ba0120d99f84154799f8880f07411f4; >= 69c087ba6225b574afb6e505b72cb75242a3d844, < d6c39774ae093c9f7009cc4ae918f18fc1af7ae7; >= 69c087ba6225b574afb6e505b72cb75242a3d844, < 92f0bd0e2b632c6565ac2214a4d7d2ed37e5b9f6; >= 69c087ba6225b574afb6e505b72cb75242a3d844, < 374b2c5561db80fcdd7cdce44af37a49416f61c7
LinuxLinux5.13

References

Timeline

Published
Last Modified
Status
Received

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-98075?
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: reject BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC reference to the main program fixups.c:jit_subprogs() rewrites BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC loads to contain real function addresses. This function is invoked from bpf_jit_subprogs() only when env->subprog_cnt > 1. Meaning that for any program like below: int main(void *ctx) { void *ptr = main; ... bpf_timer_set_callback(..., ptr); ... } The 'ptr' won't be ever converted to contain an address. In combination with e.g. bpf_timer_set_callback() this would lead to a function call at a bogus address. Instead of complicating the implementation, just assume that no useful program needs main to be a sync or async callback and reject BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC loads for the main subprogram.
How severe is CVE-2026-98075?
Severity scoring for CVE-2026-98075 is pending analysis.
How do I fix CVE-2026-98075?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.

How Strix Helps

Related CVEs from 2026

Are you affected by CVE-2026-98075?

Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.

Scan your code now

Source: NVD / NIST