CVE-2026-98490

CRITICALCVSS 9.8/10EPSS 0.62%

Last modified

CVE-2026-98490 is a critical-severity vulnerability rated 9.8/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: conntrack: fix helper UAF due to extensions realloc While calling the helpers, a raw pointer to the extensions area is wired into expectations list: -> nf_ct_helper() -> helper->help() -> nf_ct_expect_related_report() -> nf_ct_expect_insert() -> hlist_add_head_rcu(&exp->lnode, &master_help->expectations) In case the connection is not confirmed yet, more extensions can be added afterwards with *_ext_add() calls reallocating the extension space and leaving the now invalid pointer in the expectations list that is later accessed while removing the expectation. Make sure that helpers are called at the end after all the other extensions are already added. Note that the helper rejection now leaves the mark and labels set, but that's not different from how the NAT was handled before or how the mark and the labels were handled on confirmation failure. And there are no atomicity guarantees provided by the API anyway.. EPSS estimates a 0.62% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: conntrack: fix helper UAF due to extensions realloc While calling the helpers, a raw pointer to the extensions area is wired into expectations list: -> nf_ct_helper() -> helper->help() -> nf_ct_expect_related_report() -> nf_ct_expect_insert() -> hlist_add_head_rcu(&exp->lnode, &master_help->expectations) In case the connection is not confirmed yet, more extensions can be added afterwards with *_ext_add() calls reallocating the extension space and leaving the now invalid pointer in the expectations list that is later accessed while removing the expectation. Make sure that helpers are called at the end after all the other extensions are already added. Note that the helper rejection now leaves the mark and labels set, but that's not different from how the NAT was handled before or how the mark and the labels were handled on confirmation failure. And there are no atomicity guarantees provided by the API anyway.

Metrics

EPSS Probability
0.62%

49.5th percentile

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days. Learn more

Affected Software

Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.

VendorProductVersions
LinuxLinux>= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < f53d13a286fb275bda0efdf445b8a1e4dfcb717b; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 84d47a83b7b717576de0defab46b8823a22853b0; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 9f308197395c1a524b736e401cbc8a2ed7d246c9; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 18866dc1f525f9ee4de7709529d1ae1af8d8e8be; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < afcf362625190c5260530b1d6c7daa98831f6b83; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 5f23080a625dd7855ab91485c8d691a54a1979f0; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < e02a83bb0b7a203f6a22f55ad5f426765560f811; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 1a4151e6be57b098b7a5ebfbde58585e83200cdc
LinuxLinux4.3

References

Timeline

Published
Last Modified
Status
Received

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-98490?
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: conntrack: fix helper UAF due to extensions realloc While calling the helpers, a raw pointer to the extensions area is wired into expectations list: -> nf_ct_helper() -> helper->help() -> nf_ct_expect_related_report() -> nf_ct_expect_insert() -> hlist_add_head_rcu(&exp->lnode, &master_help->expectations) In case the connection is not confirmed yet, more extensions can be added afterwards with *_ext_add() calls reallocating the extension space and leaving the now invalid pointer in the expectations list that is later accessed while removing the expectation. Make sure that helpers are called at the end after all the other extensions are already added. Note that the helper rejection now leaves the mark and labels set, but that's not different from how the NAT was handled before or how the mark and the labels were handled on confirmation failure. And there are no atomicity guarantees provided by the API anyway.
How severe is CVE-2026-98490?
CVE-2026-98490 has a CVSS score of 9.8/10 (CRITICAL severity). The EPSS model estimates a 0.62% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
How do I fix CVE-2026-98490?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.

How Strix Helps

Related CVEs from 2026

Are you affected by CVE-2026-98490?

Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.

Scan your code now

Source: NVD / NIST