CVE-2026-98491

HIGHCVSS 7.8/10EPSS 0.21%

Last modified

CVE-2026-98491 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 7.8/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: conntrack: avoid modifying shared unconfirmed ct entry In a case where skb with an unconfirmed ct entry gets cloned, we may end up committing both but with different sets of extensions. The series of events: 1. The first clone wants to commit and runs the helpers wiring up the extension pointer into the expectation list. 2. EPSS estimates a 0.21% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: conntrack: avoid modifying shared unconfirmed ct entry In a case where skb with an unconfirmed ct entry gets cloned, we may end up committing both but with different sets of extensions. The series of events: 1. The first clone wants to commit and runs the helpers wiring up the extension pointer into the expectation list. 2. Then it looses the confirmation keeping the entry unconfirmed. 3. Second clone now wants to commit labels and adds the new extension for that breaking the pointer in the expectation list causing UAF on the destruction path later. While this is possible to trigger, there should be no practical network pipeline where committing both clones without modifications into the same zone is needed. So, let's just reset the entry in case for some reason we got an skb with a shared one during commit. This doesn't affect any known use cases, but avoids any potential problems with sharing and modification of the unconfirmed ct entry. The fixes tag points to the introduction of helpers, since that's the main UAF trigger for the sharing.

Metrics

EPSS Probability
0.21%

10.7th percentile

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days. Learn more

Affected Software

Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.

VendorProductVersions
LinuxLinux>= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < e0fa5ea434b7e8467ef3adc64e3858b1ca2a642d; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 37e3c878b183a115f9a114067f9ef3b408ad27fb; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 707c2dc77891a874f4e8c52c285a511079164ec8; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < de41ee24f77b0fc45397db3e277cae2adbd43dfe; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 55e5256adf3940e71802e2f749cacf81518726b0; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < e2829ae5459ddb5fce526b2e84697edf6c0c3cef; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 457e0df1b5711fbeb7ba1b6bfd826f5ef30e7e55; >= cae3a2627520c3795b54533c5328b77af3405dbe, < 26b2bd70d22457556e2fa01cbf1192cb1a94d619
LinuxLinux4.3

References

Timeline

Published
Last Modified
Status
Received

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-98491?
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: conntrack: avoid modifying shared unconfirmed ct entry In a case where skb with an unconfirmed ct entry gets cloned, we may end up committing both but with different sets of extensions. The series of events: 1. The first clone wants to commit and runs the helpers wiring up the extension pointer into the expectation list. 2. Then it looses the confirmation keeping the entry unconfirmed. 3. Second clone now wants to commit labels and adds the new extension for that breaking the pointer in the expectation list causing UAF on the destruction path later. While this is possible to trigger, there should be no practical network pipeline where committing both clones without modifications into the same zone is needed. So, let's just reset the entry in case for some reason we got an skb with a shared one during commit. This doesn't affect any known use cases, but avoids any potential problems with sharing and modification of the unconfirmed ct entry. The fixes tag points to the introduction of helpers, since that's the main UAF trigger for the sharing.
How severe is CVE-2026-98491?
CVE-2026-98491 has a CVSS score of 7.8/10 (HIGH severity). The EPSS model estimates a 0.21% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.
How do I fix CVE-2026-98491?
Check the vendor references and advisories linked above for patched versions and mitigation guidance. You can also run a Strix scan to test if your systems are affected.

How Strix Helps

Related CVEs from 2026

Are you affected by CVE-2026-98491?

Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.

Scan your code now

Source: NVD / NIST