CVE-2026-98977
Last modified
CVE-2026-98977 is a vulnerability of currently unknown severity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: namespace: handle mount locking for automounts correctly If mounts are propagated across user namespaces, attach_recursive_mnt() locks every copy of the source mount to protect overmounts from vanishing and revealing the underlying files or directories. The user namespace is taken from the caller's mount namespaces since this is where the mounts end up. Except, that's not always true. Automounts may legitimately get popped in by tasks located in a different mount and user namespace during path lookup. Then check doesn't make sense at that point. EPSS estimates a 0.18% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: namespace: handle mount locking for automounts correctly If mounts are propagated across user namespaces, attach_recursive_mnt() locks every copy of the source mount to protect overmounts from vanishing and revealing the underlying files or directories. The user namespace is taken from the caller's mount namespaces since this is where the mounts end up. Except, that's not always true. Automounts may legitimately get popped in by tasks located in a different mount and user namespace during path lookup. Then check doesn't make sense at that point. The copy in the namespace of the parent - which may be the host's - is now locked and the host cannot change the flags of its own mounts anymore. Here's the reproducer: - host has debugfs mounted nosuid,nodev,noexec and shared - tracefs automount below it is not yet active - hand a child process a directory descriptor on that mount - child process enters auser and mount namespace - child process' namespace now holds a locked copy of the host's debugfs mount that receives propagation from it - child process stats "tracing/." through the descriptor - lookup runs on the host's mount so the automount lands below the host's mount - propagation puts a copy below the child's copy - both try to clear the flags on the mount they got, with a bind remount: host, on its own automount: MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND = EPERM child, on the copy in its namespace: MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND = 0 So the lock landed on the host's mount instead of the child's copy. Congrats. So we need to compare with the owner of the namespace the mount actually gets mounted on. For all regular cases that is the caller's mount namespace and so nothing changes. Detached trees in anonymous mount namespaces by be handed over via SCM_RIGHTS or inherited in other ways on purpose so the attaching task's mount namespace is authoritative, not the creator of the detached tree.
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 132c94e31b8bca8ea921f9f96a57d684fa4ae0a9, < f9b488641cfa63f9b41321530c543688b2e34f03; >= 132c94e31b8bca8ea921f9f96a57d684fa4ae0a9, < 91676705756af6a59a515087b8b854c8a28d12eb; >= 132c94e31b8bca8ea921f9f96a57d684fa4ae0a9, < 587d25c4b13d49c8fd05df2f71240f73bb2a058c; >= 132c94e31b8bca8ea921f9f96a57d684fa4ae0a9, < 5e8f3ac8fa3d411b422ad32b9168c46a4824cc79; >= 132c94e31b8bca8ea921f9f96a57d684fa4ae0a9, < b3ccde78f1608836e62320428abc0e8aa9cf2329; >= 132c94e31b8bca8ea921f9f96a57d684fa4ae0a9, < e01c79761c7b3373e80094c5eadb21cb864fa8bc; >= 132c94e31b8bca8ea921f9f96a57d684fa4ae0a9, < 6ab37fae14196ba2262b152a7d9222c50356d278; >= 132c94e31b8bca8ea921f9f96a57d684fa4ae0a9, < 33aadc7c72055fca93cb5a3691d836ebf8b31c9b; 9c773201d61272db49f8f33a83a3cb2a3fe4b14f; >= 3.8.6, < 3.9 |
| Linux | Linux | 3.9 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-98977?
How severe is CVE-2026-98977?
How do I fix CVE-2026-98977?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-98971In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98972In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98973In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98974In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-98975In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-98976In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-98978In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.4
- CVE-2026-98979In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9898Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU in Google …8.3
- CVE-2026-98980In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2026-98981In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2026-98982In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
Are you affected by CVE-2026-98977?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
