CVE-2026-98978
Last modified
CVE-2026-98978 is a high-severity vulnerability rated 8.4/10 on the CVSS scale. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: namespace: never expire a locked mount Locked mounts are special. They protect the underlying files and directories from being revealed.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: namespace: never expire a locked mount Locked mounts are special. They protect the underlying files and directories from being revealed. do_umount() refuses to unmount locked mounts but shrink_submounts() doesn't. A shrinkable mount can become locked once the owner of a user namespace puts it beneath a locked mount with MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH. The locked property now moves to the mount at the bottom making it possible to unmount the top mount. So umount() of an unlocked ancestor now expires the bottom mount first and the covered directory is revealed: move_mount(c -> x/hidden, MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH) = 0 the cover after the lock moved: umount2(x/hidden) = 0 the holder of the lock: umount2(x/hidden) = EINVAL the root of the copy, busy: umount2(x) = EBUSY reads x/hidden/secret: "covered-by-root" So leave a locked mount alone as it dies together with its parent. A plain umount() of an unlocked mount with a locked one below it is EBUSY from now on. It's the same for any other locked child. A lazy umount still takes the whole tree. mark_mounts_for_expiry() never sees a locked mount. lock_mnt_tree() leaves a mount on an expiry list alone and nothing else puts a locked one on such a list. Add an assert for this.
Metrics
Affected Software
Source: CNA advisory (CVE.org). NVD analysis pending.
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | >= 5ff9d8a65ce80efb509ce4e8051394e9ed2cd942, < 6b8dc3713a76346d212abab46cbfc8d7070f534c; >= 5ff9d8a65ce80efb509ce4e8051394e9ed2cd942, < d23265a12e4991ce7aedce670c0b6b598cadb644; >= 5ff9d8a65ce80efb509ce4e8051394e9ed2cd942, < f78ddcc872248c7aa1d7e904928441a0be4c6d5d |
| Linux | Linux | 3.12 |
References
Timeline
- Published
- Last Modified
- Status
- Received
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CVE-2026-98978?
How severe is CVE-2026-98978?
How do I fix CVE-2026-98978?
How Strix Helps
- How Strix found a critical auth bypass in etcdStrix autonomously discovered a critical authentication bypass in etcd, later designated CVE-2026-33413.
- Autonomous PentestingAI agents that find and validate exploitable vulnerabilities like this one across your applications.
- PR ReviewsPentest every pull request so vulnerable code is caught before it ships to production.
- AI Penetration TestingHow AI-driven penetration testing continuously covers your attack surface.
Related CVEs from 2026
- CVE-2026-98972In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98973In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98974In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-98975In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-98976In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-98977In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-98979In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
- CVE-2026-9898Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU in Google …8.3
- CVE-2026-98980In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2026-98981In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…8.8
- CVE-2026-98982In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…7.8
- CVE-2026-98983In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been re…
Are you affected by CVE-2026-98978?
Run a free Strix scan to check your systems for this vulnerability.
Scan your code nowSource: NVD / NIST
